It’s been ages since I posted anything here (sorry!), mainly because I haven’t bought any more lenses! This nice 21mm f3.5 was swapped for my Zuiko 18mm earlier in the year as it was a bit too wide for my tastes, and really I always wanted the 21mm. It hasn’t been used that much so far so I thought I’d give it a proper test and share the results. Wandering round with just this lens was an interesting experience for someone who’s current favourite focal length is 50mm – sometimes it seemed just too wide an angle of view.
Physically it’s tiny and light – about the same size as my 50mm f1.8, 1 1/4 inches long (3cm ish) and it weighs 7 1/2 ounces (212 g) so very portable. The angle of view is 92 degrees and a very close focussing distance of 8 inches (or 20cm) to infinity focus is achieved in around 1/4 of a turn. And of course being a Zuiko it’s very well made too. It matches the A7R very well as do most of the smaller Zuikos. The A7R’s love of a default 1/60th of a second in ‘A’ mode with MF lenses is also nothing to worry about at 21 mm.
The filter thread is the normal 49mm screw in, but even thin filters cause vignetting so I’ve stopped using them on this lens, so no polarizer or NDs unless you’re prepared to do some cropping in PP.
Focussing using focus magnify works well, though at smaller apertures it’s more difficult as there’s a lot in focus, and the changes when the focus ring is turned are fairly subtle. The ‘focus peaking’ feature is pretty useless with lenses as wide as this for the same reason. As with the 18mm, the depth of field scale is pretty optimistic and the zone of really sharp focus is narrower than you might expect – in other words, always use ‘focus magnify’!
I couldn’t provoke much flare on a sunny day – this lens seems excellent in this respect. I did find an odd circular internal reflection in one shot when the sun was pretty much in the centre of the image which I quite like :-
Native vignetting is moderate at f3.5, gone by f5.6 :-
Distortion when pointed upwards is obvious – what you’d expect really from an ultra-wide :-
Close distance distortion is also remarkably low – this was taken very close to the fence and is uncorrected :-
OK – it’s all looking good so far, what about the resolution? All of these are straight RAW conversions so note that the minimal CA and distortion could be cleaned up quite easily. Here’s the test scene (same as earlier in the post), edge crop from the centre left.
f3.5, the edge crop darkened by the natural vignetting of the lens.
So – optimal between f5.6 and f8, tailing off slightly at f11 and f16 (not shown). Quite predictable really. However this is a remarkably consistent performance across the aperture range with minimal CA wide open. It’s nice and sharp in the centre at all apertures, but the edges are never really achieve the same resolution.
In conclusion then, apart from the edge performance which I’d call ‘good’ (or ‘good enough’ for my purposes) a very good lens. Small, light, low distortion, low CA, sharp in the centre and can do sun stars as a party trick. I might use this lens ten or twenty times a year and for me the positives easily outweigh the negatives so I’m keeping this one! If you use this focal length all the time and need better edge performance something more expensive might be in order.
Second hand they range in price between £200 and £300 which is pretty cheap. As with all older lenses exposures have to be carefully monitored (they tend towards one to two stops of under exposure so watch the histogram), some PP will be required on all images, mainly contrast enhancement but the clarity slider in CS is remarkably useful too.
Hope you find this useful, thanks for looking!
Welcome back! Nice write up OM a beautiful little lens.
Thanks Frank – it certainly is.
Good to see you back Rob, have missed your posts 🙂
Nice writeup, thank you Robert.
This is very helpful. Now I know for shure that I will stick to my 20mm Nikkor.
Also a big thanks for your “six months with a Sony A7R…”, it kept me from buying the camera and instead helped me concentrating on black and white film processing.
Glad you found it useful.
I try to be as objective as I can with these reviews, and although I’m more than happy with the A7R and a few Zuikos (very cost effective) it isn’t for everyone. The percentage of film vs digital that I shoot now has declined dramatically as I shoot more and more images for different agencies who seem less interested in B/W shots and want large, highly processed clean colour images (it’s the current commercial trend). When it changes again in a few years the OM2s will surface again! The tiny 21mm is good enough for me but I’m sure there are better lenses out there (your nikon 20mm for example) which would be more appropriate if you use it all the time.
just stumbled over your blog and it is the first useful resource I have found on Olympus OM lenses on digital FF. So thanks for sharing and keep them coming 🙂
Why did you stopped writing? You did such a great job over the years…
Thanks for the comment. Too many other things to do I’m afraid….
Roll on that time when your OM2 comes out to play again and you feel the urge to put pen to paper (finger to key?) once more.
Your writings are missed! 😦
Pingback: The Zuiko 24-48 f4 on A Sony A7R – 28mmf2