I’ve been hunting around for a pocket camera which can produce commercial quality images for some time now, and I’ve finally found one which fits the bill. This mini-test describes some ‘first impressions’ after a few weeks.
In order to be useful it needed to replace my old Canon G9 (which has done a brilliant job as a “carry everywhere” workhorse), be truly pocketable and have around 18-25 Mp resolution to prevent excessive image resizing to meet minimal agency requirements. It must also shoot RAW to give the widest flexibility in post processing….
Here’s another on a CD with the roll of 35mm film – it really is tiny!
The lens is a 28-100mm equivalent, f1.8 to f4.9. f4.9 is slow for a 100mm lens – however my Canon 15-85mm zoom on the 60D is f5.6 at 85mm so it’s not that bad! In bright light, the 1/2000th of a second shutter isn’t fast enough for f1.8 at 28mm so a neutral density filter is needed if you want to get shallow depth of field effects (it can be held over the lens).
The physical controls are very configurable – I’ve assigned ISO to the rotating ring around the lens mount, and exposure compensation, image quality, DRO optimisation level, AF mode etc to the Fn button. In aperture priority mode the rear control dial varies the aperture, and it all works well. The camera keeps up well with frantic setting changes so no complaints.
20Mp image quality is very good with low noise to to ISO 800 – about the same normal working range I’d use on the 60D. The large sensor is obviously making a significant difference.
Sharpness at 28mm and f1.8 is a bit weak probably due to distortion correction, but cleans up by f2.5. At longer focal lengths its sharp enough across the frame for me.
The Sony RAW converter is OK – but converting the ARW files to DNG format with Adobe’s RAW converter then using Adobe Camera RAW processing gives better results with more flexibility. Colour seems a little over saturated in RAW – especially a yellow hue to greens. ACR colour profiles by Maurizio Piraccini here allow for more neutrals results – and add a few colour options (thanks!).
Macro at 28mm and f1.8 is excellent, but the minimum focus distance increases dramatically as the focal length increases. The shallow depth of field at these close focus settings produces some good results – but it’s not a fast 50mm or 85mm on APSC or 35mm.
It reminds me most of a 35mm Minox camera which was a lovely small camera with a fixed sharp 35mm f2.8 lens. I really liked that camera – until it broke through overuse.
The special effects modes (JPEG only) aren’t bad, 10 frames per second is a bit over the top for me, but the multi frame dynamic range options and DRO settings look promising – I’ll do a test at a later date. All in all a very flexible package, and combined with an IR R72 and Neutral density filter (58mm diameter) a very portable one too.
Hope you find this useful and thanks for looking.
Interesting information on this, it looks to be a very useful camera.
I have the Sony RX100 and am very pleased with it. Its my transition camera before getting a DSLR 🙂
It seems so far (3 weeks) to be a brilliant little camera – very portable so it’s going to get a lot of use!
Thanks. Currently looking for a camera I can carry around with me day to day.
Glad you found it useful! It’s a very capable camera for it’s size.
Do you use the RX100 for commercial shots? I almost got one and ended up getting the Panasonic FZ1000 which is similar quality. I find the FZ gets acceptable photos in the right light but generally lacks something compared to my 6D.
Hello Kenny! The RX100 is fine for agency work – the MK3 even more so. Most of my Plainpicture stuff will have been shot on one – more than the A7R in fact. Probably because I carry it everywhere. The Canon G9 years ago filled a similar role and paid for itself many times over. Good luck with your Arcangel subs – I’ll get round to one soon!
Thanks, Rob. Good luck getting to the Plainpicture quota.